Archives

As a landlord, do I have to pay for improvements? What is “no cost” funding? Where can I find out more?

WARNING:  This exemption is only available until April 2019 due to changes being made to the legislation.  After this, landlords will be required to fund improvements up to a £3500 cap.

A Landlord is only required to make improvements to meet the minimum standard if they can do so at no cost to themselves.  No cost funding can come from a range of sources including:

    • Green Deal Finance,
    • ECO help to heat funding,
  • Local Authorities home energy efficiency grants,
  • tenants,
  • any other source not repaid by the landlord,
  • any combination of the above.

For general advice and assistance on energy efficiency funding, landlords can contact the Energy Savings Advice Service on 0300 123 1234.  For scheme specific information landlords should:

    • Green Deal Finance: Search for a local Green Deal Provider (details can be found on the Green Deal Finance Company website www.gdfc.co.uk) or through the enquiry form on the GDFC website;
    • ECO help to heat programme: Contact the Energy Savings Advice Service on 0300 123 1234 or email energy-advice@est.org.uk, (where appropriate the landlord may need to ask their tenant to contact ESAS themselves);
  • Local Authority funding: Contact their local Authorities for information on any home energy efficiency grants available.

Note: The New Regulations

On 19th December 2017 the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) launched a new consultation to amend the Regulations.  The consultation concluded on 13 March 2018, and legislation has subsequently been made to introduce a funding cap.  From April 2019 Landlords will be required to make improvements to a property up to the cap (currently £3500 per property) before being able to claim an exemption.  At the same time the original “no cost” exemptions will be removed.

Further information can be found on the BEIS website on GOV.UK

Do I have to make particular improvements like those listed on the EPC? Are there any recommended or required materials which should be used to undertake the improvement works?

The guidance issued by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy on this subject is very clear.  It states:

There are no specified materials or improvement measures; a landlord is free to do whatever they like with their property so long as the EPC rating can be raised to meet the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard. The most assessable source of advice would be the recommended measures section on EPC for the property, but landlords can seek advice from other suitably qualified experts if they wish.

Are holiday lets and hotel rooms covered by MEES?

Holiday lets, together with rooms in hotels and bed & breakfast accommodation are typically let under a licence to occupy, rather than a tenancy.  Therefore, this type of rental property is normally outside of the scope of the Energy Efficiency (Private Rented Property) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015 and not required to meet the MEES.

If there are any concerns about whether a property is occupied under a licence or a tenancy, and whether the landlord is subject to the Regulations, independent specialist legal advice should be sought.

Are Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) excluded from the PRS Regulations and MEES?

HMOs are not excluded from the Energy Efficiency (Private Rented Property) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015. The Regulations apply to all privately rented properties that are legally required to have an EPC, and where rooms are let on one of the qualifying types of tenancy (most likely assured tenancies). An HMO will be in scope where it meets these criteria.

However, individual rooms within HMOs are not required to have their own EPC, so a property which is an HMO will only have an EPC if one is required for the property as a whole (typically this will be if the property has been build, sold or rented as a single unit at any time in the past 10 years). If an HMO is legally required to have an EPC, and if it is let on one of the qualifying tenancy types, then it will be required to comply with the minimum level of energy efficiency.

NB:  Many HMOs are run on a commercial basis and as such are business premises.  Where this is the case they would normally require a non-domestic EPC like a hotel, hostel, care home or student accommodation block rather than a domestic EPC.

What types of tenancies are covered by MEES? Does it apply to properties occupied under Licence?

The tenancy types that the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard (MEES) applies to are:

  • An assured tenancy (including an assured short hold tenancy) defined in the Housing Act 1988.
  • A regulated tenancy defined in the Rent Act 1977.
  • An agricultural tenancy as set out in the Energy Efficiency (Domestic Private Rented Property) Order 2015.

The Energy Efficiency (Private Rented Property) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015 only apply to tenancies in the private rented sector.  They do not apply to properties owned by councils and social landlords.  Similarly, they do not apply to properties occupied under licence without a qualifying tenancy.

What exemptions exist for MEES (Domestic Buildings)?

Whilst the exemptions are relatively straight forward, applying them is more complex and can also involve understanding the separate regulations that apply to both Energy Performance Certificates and the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards.  There are some organisations suggesting that landlords can easily avoid improving their buildings by claiming an exemption.  Our experience is that this is more difficult than it first appears and could easily cost more than improving the building to meet the standards.

Exempt buildings and tenancies

Not all buildings and tenancies fall within The Energy Efficiency (Private Rental Property) (England and Wales) Regulations 2015.  The MEES do not apply to:

  • Buildings that have not been legally required to have an EPC.  These can include some listed buildings (see our specific notes on this topic), temporary properties, some HMOs and holidays lets.  It will also apply if the property has not been built, sold, let or significantly altered since the introduction of EPCs.
  • Buildings without a valid EPC.  This would include buildings where the EPC is over ten years old when it is relied upon for the MEES regulations.
  • Buildings only with a voluntary EPC.  An EPC may have been lodged for any number of reasons.  EPCs completed for purposes other than the construction, sale, let or significant alteration of the building, including those lodged in a mistaken understanding that one was required, are known as voluntary EPCs.  A building is only subject to MEES if the EPC was legally required.  NB: There is currently no way to tell this from the EPC itself and so you will need to know the history of whether or not the building has legally required an EPC.
  • Buildings occupied solely under licence.  MEES only applies to buildings occupied under a “Relevant Tenancy”.  This includes an assured tenancy, a regulated tenancy and domestic agricultural tenancies.  If the occupier is present only under a licence to occupy the MEES requirements will not apply as there is no tenancy.
  • Social housing schemes.  The regulations apply only to privately rented properties.  Social housing is exempt from MEES regardless of its condition, quality, or EPC rating.

Exemptions from making improvements

There are a number of circumstances where an exemption or multiple exemptions from making improvements can be claimed.  Where an exemption of this type is claimed, it may be possible to continue to rent out a substandard property.  However, all exemptions of this nature must be lodged on the PRS Exemptions Register.

Additionally, it should be noted that specific supporting evidence is required before registering an exemption on the PRS Exemptions Register.  We can provide specialist advice in this area as part of our service but would always caution clients that meeting these requirements can cost significantly more than making improvements to meet the MEES.  This will obviously depend upon the building and the improvements required but changing a few lights will likely be cheaper than obtaining professional services to prove a property will be devalued for example.

Registered exemptions are also non-transferable.  At best they are valid for a maximum of five years but a change in tenant or sale to a new landlord will normally mean the process (and costs involved) will have to be repeated.  Only then can new exemptions be registered.  There are also significant penalties for making a false or misleading declaration on the PRS Exemptions Register.

The main exemptions from making an improvement are:

  • All relevant improvements have been made – Where all the improvements suggested have been made and the property still remains below the MEES.
  • Incompatible wall insulation improvements – Where independent experts conclude that it is inappropriate to make the wall insulation improvements suggested as they would have a negative impact on the structure or fabric of the property (or the building of which it is part).
  • Improvements which cannot be financed without cost to the landlord – Landlords are not required to make improvements where relevant “no cost” funding is not available.  However, they must attempt to take advantage of funding that is available and must be able to demonstrate this.  Improvements that do not meet the new “Golden Rule” for Green Deal funding may fall within this exemption but only if alternative funding is not available.
  • Devaluation of the property – You are not required to make an improvement where an independent surveyor determines that making it would devalue the property by more then 5% of its current market value.
  • Third Party Consent is refused – Where there is a sitting tenant you might complete the formal process required in offering to improve the property and consent may be withheld.  Equally, you may require consent from a superior landlord, a bank or building society or the local authority which may be reasonably refused.  However, you will have to demonstrate that you have applied for permission and have tried to accommodate any reasonable restrictions that they have placed upon you before you can claim this exemption.  This exemption can also be used where planning, conservation or other consents are required from statutory authorities providing it can be demonstrated that these have been applied for and refused.

Please note that every suggested improvement must be considered individually for the purposes of claiming exemptions.  It is therefore highly likely that, even where some improvements may be subject to exemptions, others will not.  In this situation, some improvements to the building will still need to be made.

What is Legionella?

Legionella is a scientific term used to describe a group bacteria that can cause serious illness.  The video below explains more:

I own my own home, should I get a Legionella Risk Assessment completed?

There is not normally a legal requirement for you to have a Legionella Risk Assessment on your own home.  However, you would require one if any of the following apply:

  • You rent all or part of your home out to tenants, lodgers or paying guests;
  • You use all or part of your home for business purposes where the Health and Safety at Work Act applies; or
  • You otherwise have a legal duty of care to protect others present at the property which requires risk assessments to be completed.

However, Legionella bacteria do not care if you own your home or rent it.  If the water systems are not properly maintained Legionella bacteria can grow and exposure could result in Legionellosis.  Having a Legionella Risk Assessment completed will help you protect your family and minimise your risk of infection.  It can also help you plan appropriate maintenance of your system and identify improvements you can make.

You may particularly wish to consider having an assessment completed on your own home in the following situations:

  • You have just purchased a new home that has not been recently assessed;
  • You have very high risk equipment present (particularly hot tubs, whirlpool baths, spa pools, swimming pools, sauna, steam rooms etc); or
  • Members of your family are at high risk (e.g. those over 50, babies and children and those with weakened immune systems).

Can I save money and do my own Legionella Risk Assessment?

The simple answer is yes.  What’s more, in some circumstances we would advise that you do!

So now you may be asking yourself why we offer a Legionella Risk Assessment service and why would you pay us to do it for you?  This is really the important question.

The regulations require that those completing the risk assessment must be competent.  This means you must have the necessary knowledge, skills and experience to do the job properly.  You do not need any specific qualifications but you must:

  • understand the hazards and risks;
  • know how exposure of people to substances hazardous to health can occur;
  • have the ability (and authority) to collect all the necessary information;
  • have the knowledge, skills and experience to make the right decisions about how to control exposure.

If you get it wrong you could face criminal prosecution and civil liabilities from those affected.

We know that the majority of reputable landlords have better things to do with their time than study the latest guidance and regulations.  Instead, our assessors are trained and experienced in the field ensuring that they are competent to do this for you.  They also undergo regular Continuing Professional Development and Quality Assurance monitoring to ensure that the assessments they complete are accurate.  As such, you can be sure that both you and your tenants are receiving the most accurate and up-to-date advice available.

Additionally, we are fully insured for the services we provide just in case anything should ever go wrong.

However, we don’t believe in delivering services that are not required.  Therefore, we are happy to explain how you can conduct regular reviews of the risk assessment yourself.  Once we have provided an initial assessment and report, you can keep it under regular review yourself.  You can then contact us again to conduct a reassessment if you think it might need updating, especially if your situation changes.  Indeed, many of our clients contact us regularly to reassess properties just to make sure that nothing has changed or needs updating.

In summary, it is a professional service you are purchasing, not just a written report.

How long is a Legionella Risk Assessment valid?

If you search the Internet you will find lots of different answers to this question quoting different time periods.  This may lead you to suspect some must be wrong.  However, to a degree they are probably all correct but there is actually no specific or defined validity period.  The important thing is to understand the legal background to a Legionella Risk Assessment and then you can understand how the validity will depend upon the exact details of your situation.

In the UK, a Legionella Risk Assessment is a special kind of Risk Assessment known as a COSHH Assessment.  COSHH stands for the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health.  The current rules are published in the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations 2002.  You can find out more in the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) publication INDG136 – Working with substances
hazardous to health.

The regulations require that a COSHH Assessment should be revisited regularly to ensure that it is kept up to date.  It is also the duty of the responsible person to determine the date of the first review and the length of time between successive reviews as part of the assessment process.  Both of these periods will depend on type of risk, the work, and the responsible person’s judgement on the likelihood of changes occurring.

The law requires that a COSHH assessment, including Legionella Risk Assessments, be reviewed immediately if:

  • There is any reason to suppose that the original assessment is no longer valid, e.g. evidence from the results of examining and testing engineering controls, reports from supervisors about defects in control systems; or
  • Any of the circumstances of the work should change significantly and especially one which may have affected people’s exposure to a hazardous substance

The HSE point out that the requirement is for a review of the assessment.  This does not mean that the whole assessment process will have to be repeated at each review.  The first purpose of review is to see if the existing assessment is still suitable and sufficient.  If it is, then you do not need to do any more.

Even if it appears that the assessment is no longer valid, it does not mean that the whole assessment has to be revised.  Only those parts that do not reflect the new situation need amending.

Whether or not there is any real change in the situation, there is an absolute requirement to review the situation on a regular basis.  Without this, there is a danger that gradual change over a period of time goes unnoticed and the assessment becomes unsuitable and insufficient by default.  It is generally accepted that this period should not exceed 12 months but may need to be shorter if there are high risks and can be extended if there is a stable situation and the risks identified are very low.

It should be noted that any Legionella Risk Assessment in place should be immediately reviewed if any of the following apply:

  • There are any changes to the water system or its use.  This can include the installation of new taps, boilers and the like.
  • There are changes to the use of the building in which the water system is installed.  For example, a dwelling may become an House of Multiple Occupation.  Alternatively, a rented property may be empty and out of use for a period of time.
  • There is availability of new information about risks or control measures.  This can include new guidance for specialist items like cooling towers, air conditioning systems, spa pools etc.
  • The results of checks indicate that control measures are no longer effective or there is a case of legionnaires’ disease / legionellosis associated with the system.  This could include visible algae growth, unpleasant smells, discolouration of the water or a build up of sludge in pipes or water tanks.
  • There are changes to key personnel.  This would include a change in the tenants.  New tenants will need to be informed of appropriate control measures they should and may be at higher or lower risk.  Their occupancy may also follow different patterns which can change the risks from Legionella in the building.